Sony 100mm f2.8 STF GM Review


Maximum: f/2.8
Minimum: f/20
85.2 x 118.1 mm
Filter Thread
72 mm
700 g
Max Magnification
Min Focusing Distance
57 cm
Number of aperture blades
11, Rounded
14 / 10
Optical Stabilization
Weather Resistance

The Sony 100mm STF lens is perhaps the most unique and controversial lens in the Sony E-mount lineup. When it was first announced, we investigated the lens with great interest, but the 2 stops of light loss and T5.6 transmission instead of true f2.8 led us to believe we wouldn’t be able to make good use of it. Yet as time went on, and we saw more results from the lens, our desire for it grew and grew until we decided to get one for ourselves.

Build Quality

The lens features dust and moisture sealing. Because it is branded a G Master or GM lens, it has a solid construction that feels a bit more premium than the G branded lenses. The lens hood is plastic, while the zoom and focus rings are sturdy and rubberized.

The lens is not too large and heavy, and it feels well-balanced on our Sony a7RIII and a9 cameras. The lens has optical image stabilization (OSS), which is important for getting sharp images at telephoto focal lengths.

With all of the switches on the lens body, it looks quite serious.

[Taken with the Zeiss Batis 85mm]

There are physical controls for focus limiter, AF/MF, optical stabilization, and a focus hold button. The focus limiter ring allows selecting between two focusing ranges: a dedicated close-up range for working with close objects in the range of 0.57m–1.0m with a 0.25x maximum magnification, and farther range of 0.85m to infinity with maximum of 0.14x magnification. The focus hold button can be set to a variety of other functions; we like to set the button to eye autofocus.

The manual aperture ring can be de-clicked for smooth, silent aperture for video purposes. There is some slight focus breathing, but minimal enough that it shouldn’t be too distracting in video.

Finally, the 100mm STF lens has a special apodization filter inside, a lens element that becomes progressively darker towards its edges, causing a few stops of light loss. It is also this filter that causes the extremely smooth blurring effect of a Smooth Trans Focus or STF lens.

[Sony official press material—comparison between STF and traditional lens rendering]


All of the other STF lenses on the market today are manual focus or contrast detect-only, since the apodization filter blocks out the peripheral light necessary for traditional autofocus mechanisms to function.

The T5.6 light transmission of the lens limits its usage in low light conditions without supplemental lighting, but with good high ISO performance on the latest generation of full-frame sensors and Sony’s on-sensor PDAF, autofocus works well even indoors.

In normal lighting conditions, autofocus is fast and smooth, and the silent focusing motor is good for video.

Image Quality

The 100mm STF is likely the sharpest lens we’ve ever used. Independent tests back up our observations, as it is one of the top 3 sharpest lenses in the Sony E-mount system. Stopped down it can serve as a great landscape lens.

While the in-focus areas are extremely sharp, the out-of-focus background blur is extremely smooth. The combined effect is quite entrancing to see, especially at high resolution.

Images feel three-dimensional and realistic, because the smooth transition from in-focus to out-of-focus more closely resembles the way our eyes see the world.

This lens is amazing for flower and foliage shots, especially in the close focusing mode. We’ve seen effects online in other photos, but to effortlessly reproduce it ourselves is a ton of fun. And that’s what a photography hobby should be, right?

The background blur is not perfect, however. There can be some double bokeh under certain circumstances, as seen in the upper left leaf of the photo below.

For portraits at medium distance, it tames the background but still lets you see what the background is. There are times when this is desirable, but other times when perhaps blowing the background out completely might be preferable. For the most part, we love the way the 100mm STF lens renders.

When the subject is close, there is a very cinematic feel to the resulting image.

The colors straight out of the lens tend towards the neutral cool side compared to the Zeiss Batis 85mm, which tends towards warmer colors. We post-process all of our photos so that this difference is not a major factor.

The lens performs well in most situations. Only under extreme backlit conditions will the lens flare and lose some contrast.

For in-focus areas there is no noticeable amount of chromatic aberration or purple fringing even in extremely high contrast situations.

Specular highlights are perfectly round and are smooth in the middle, but can have some more defined edges.

When we compare the rendering of the background blur with our Zeiss Batis 85mm, the difference of the STF lens becomes more apparent. Both are excellent lenses for portraits, but they render the background differently, especially if the scene is busy with foliage or has highlights.

100mm STF — Batis 85mm

Click on the photos to see the larger size. The photos were taken from similar positions, and the 85mm has a wider view of the scene compared to 100mm. The Batis 85mm has more “cat’s eye bokeh balls,” and the 100mm STF has round, circular-shaped highlights and smoother background blur. Some people might prefer the more structure and highlights in the more traditional lens design bokeh, and others might prefer the STF bokeh.

We take photos of both of our kids, and too shallow DOF is a detriment to keeping both in focus. We were shooting our 85mm at f2.8 or f3.5 a lot to try to get both kids in focus, and the bokeh can become busy when there’s a lot of foliage in the background for traditional lenses.

The 100mm STF has the ability to tame just about every background situation. The background is smooth but still looks recognizable. There are no hot spots from bright bokeh balls distracting from the main subject. We found that most of our “keepers” are taken outside in ample light, so the f5.6 transmission is generally not an issue.

Foreground blurring is also incredibly smooth, and there is minimal “double bokeh” when foreground blur blends into background blur.

This lens is excellent for taming both backgrounds and foregrounds, letting the subject shine instead of distracting from the main focus.

Because of its unique background rendering and great sharpness, the 100mm STF can also serve as a landscape lens.



  • Dust and moisture resistance
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Silent, accurate and fast autofocus
  • Very sharp image quality
  • Extremely smooth background blur
  • Little to no chromatic aberration
  • Light vignetting wide open


  • T5.6 transmission can be limiting
  • Expensive at $1500

This lens seems so specialized from its specifications that we initially dismissed it, but after using it, we couldn’t help but adore it. If there’s one word to describe this lens, it’s special. The way the lens renders the world is so natural and smooth, but without comparing it side-by-side with other traditional lenses we wouldn’t even notice it. We would just notice the super sharp subject which melts into the background in a dreamy three-dimensional and seemingly effortless way. We have really fallen in love with the 100mm STF.

← Back to previous page

4 responses to “Sony 100mm f2.8 STF GM Review”

  1. […], Sony RX10 IV Field Test Part II (Imaging Resource). 100mm STF review by Tokina 105mm T1.5 Vista Prime and 11-20mm Cinema ATX T2.9 lenses (Newsshooter). NAB 2018: An Array […]

  2. Yucel says:

    Can you provide some more details on low light focusing?

    I’m thinking of using this often at night or indoors to tame bokeh of street lights and such.

    Also, re the flare with back lit subjects, is it more than w a traditional lens, same, or less?

    Thank you

  3. Hi Yucel, the low light focusing is generally fine, but the loss of light could pose problem. If you stop down your native lens to f5.6 indoors, that would be comparable to the autofocus performance.

    Here is an example with backlit flare. It is not too much more severe than other traditional lenses, but more than lenses with Zeiss coatings.

  4. I’ve been looking at all the reviews on the STF lens and your is by far the best, you answered all my questions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *